Feb 17, 2017

I Get Frustrated, Lemme Tell Ya --- Trying to Discuss Global Warming with Those who Buy the Mythology of Science

Images (mostly) by Basil Wolverton

Here's an argument I get from one particularly rabid Science True Believer (specifically about man-made global warming, but it could apply to any controversy):

"Oh, are you kidding me! If somebody could disprove global warming (evolution, vaccines, etc.) do you know how famous they'd be? Scientists would LOVE to make a discovery like that. They can't do it though!

But yeah, scientists love to pick apart each other's ideas... they're always sniping at each other, trying to find the flaws in each others' research... If anybody could disprove global warming, they'd ABSOLUTELY do so, because it would make their career!"

Et cetera, and so on. I think I have given the gist of the argument, and the tone, if not the exact words used.

There are two things that make this difficult to refute, in the midst of a lively conversation with multiple parties jumping in and diverting:

1) The total incredulity at any challenges to their idea (note exclamation points, and emphatic all-caps words.) They basically don't want to hear another point of view, and barely listen to anything you say.

2) My response is sort of complex, difficult to put in a sound-bite or short phrase. It strains the amount of attention-span they are willing to give me. I have, like, 5 seconds to make my case, and then they may interrupt, go off on something else, make a joke, get distracted, etc.

(Continued...)

Feb 15, 2017

The Polanski-Allen Blackwash Double-Whammy Two-Step

Woody Allen and Martin Landau in "Crimes and Misdemeanors"


From time to time I think about the glut of "content" we suffer from --- the neverending flood of Seemingly Valid Shit (SVS) --- and I was doing that this morning, my mind wandering idly.

Then I had to play devil's advocate: "There is SOME stuff I like... some movies, some directors... Woody Allen, Roman Polanski. Guys like that. That stuff's okay... "

What struck though me is that both make movies "for adults" --- that is, mature, thoughtful, meaningful films, with artistic and aesthetic merit --- in fact Polanski jokingly said this in one interview I watched, in his funny broken English (paraphrasing):

Feb 11, 2017

"Old Stuff" volumes 1 &2 --- Info and cover designs

Some have accused me of "hoarding away" artwork... keeping it all "to myself."

My response?

I scoffed. As if any fool would slave away for hours and hours, writing, penciling, inking, and cross-hatching page after page of comics (my god the cross-hatching!) only to keep it all to themselves.

Fah. Thus I scoffed.

Then, it dawned on me... slowly at first, but with quickening speed as I thumbed through the tattered old boxes that constitute my archives. I HAVE been hoarding comics away!!!!



Ever since the 90s I've been plying the old crowquill pen, trying to get a hearing for my pathetic little doodles. I've got TONS of old stuff that's never seen the light of day (well, of this blog. Or a print-on-demand publishing service.)

So. It begins. I'm going to scan this old blarney and try to get 'er up on the Create 'em Space.

The plan is to divide the material into two books, one more family friendly, and the other representing my embarrassing attempts at "edgy" material. Sigh.

Here's the "edgy" cover for that material (click on "Read More):




Feb 3, 2017

Bringing it all Together: Lysenko, Lamarckism, and the Midwife Toad



Three concepts. Three terms I was KIND OF, vaguely, familiar with. But, until today, did not realize connected up in a neat package with a bow on top.

It was today, you see, that I read Chapter 10 of Betrayers of the Truth. Betrayers is an early 80s expose' of Science as actually practiced. Science, in all its human ambition, hubris, fraud and deceit. It's a curious book, written by some mainstream science writers, but attacking the sacred myths of mainstream science: objectivity, professional integrity, peer review, the scientific method, and all the rest. They tear Science a new one, basically.

One might ask, What's their game, exactly, here? Biting the hand that feeds them, it would seem. Are they a limited hangout of some sort, or propping up some other myths? Perhaps so, but they raise