My friend Chris Garrison sent me this nice "review"/critique of "Pete Moss" #1 a while back and it just occurred to me to post it here for others to enjoy. You can see pages from the comic here. Also be sure to check out Chris's weekly comic on Sundays at dummcomics.com.
[...] It was neat that the cover was a real scene from the story, but then when I read that scene, it was kind of weird that there wasn't a big splash panel or something as spectacular as the cover image.
I
love all the architectural flourishes throughout, like the things
around the balcony on the cover, plants, carpet patterns, etc. Lovely.
Reminds me of Winsor McKay.
All those panels
in the top 2 tiers of page 1 are awesome. They look so perfect and
classic. Especially the 1st one on the top tier, and the 1st one on the
2nd tier. And the 1st 2 panels on page 2. And I love this scritchy
little line, that makes it look like a 1923 strip or something. Like
Lyonel Feininger.
I don't mind that there are
some thick and thin lines throughout, but to keep that cool look, I'd
use the thick more sparingly, and only with purpose. Like, to put
something clearly in the foreground, thicken it, but don't have
senseless thick lines, and definitely try to avoid thick lines on
something far away,
when there are thin lines on something closer to the camera. I mean, it's not like you do that a lot or something, it's not totally haphazard, I'm just saying there are places where I think it would be improved if you were more careful about it.
when there are thin lines on something closer to the camera. I mean, it's not like you do that a lot or something, it's not totally haphazard, I'm just saying there are places where I think it would be improved if you were more careful about it.
The
old-fashioned way Pete talks is great. Keep that up. And I like his
character. He seems sweetly naive, but sometimes it comes out that he
can be selfish or plotting. But somehow that feels consistent and
believable. I don't know why. Good stuff, though. I like Pete a lot.
Pete is like Tintin, in that he's a child-man, who has travel adventures.
This
is a minor thing, but ... I feel like Pete has a nice flat,
Feininger-like design ... then a lot of other characters have a rounded,
'70's, School House Rock style of design ... then the girls are more
like, I don't know, Betty & Veronica style, sort of. I think those
different sensibilities make the comic feel rather mish-moshed. If all
the characters felt more like they were from the same artist, the world
would seem more cohesive and real. Of course, I love the broad
variations in proportion and such, from one character to the next.
That's what I strive for myself, a lot of times. Something I admire in
Asterix, for instance. But there's something about the stylistic
nature of the characters which, I think, would probably be better if it
were more consistent.
This is supposed to be an
"all ages" comic, right? But I'd argue that El Pulpo inviting the
woman up to his room ... then they're up there alone, smooching ... and
we don't know if she's his wife, girlfriend, or a groupie he met five
minutes previous ... I mean, it's not wildly shocking, but they
definitely wouldn't allow that scene in a Donald Duck comic. Just
sayin'. I think that's the only thing that's not quite "all ages" about
it.
I love how Pete keeps popping up to harass El Pulpo, tapping on the glass and everything. That's hilarious.
I LOVE the word comicker. I've never heard that. I want to start using it.
That's
a great drawing of K-05, bowing to the hotel guest. The agents remind
me of Osamu Tezuka characters, somehow. Which is awesome.
Careening
cab at the bottom of page 5: Yes, that's exactly how cartoon cars
should always be drawn. In midair like that. Love it.
They're
descending the steps at El Pulpo's -- I love that you take the time to
invent this whole, nice living room ... but there had to be a way to
arrange it where Pete's word balloon doesn't have to stretch way down to
the bottom. Unacceptable! (pounding fist on table)
Having heard the CLUNK!, as Pete walks to the door -- again, Feininger-style perfection. Awesomely simple.
As
he's opening the cab door and getting in, I can't understand his face.
Maybe that's some sort of thingy on the edge of the door, but it looks
like he's wearing a mask or I don't know what. Confusion. But I love
the fat, white, speed-tilted tires in that whole sequence.
Last three panels: Pete's ankles have narrowed, compared to the squared legs which I like much more on page 1.
I
wish we'd seen some images of Dronar. It seems like a badly missed
opportunity for creative fun, to have a comic within a comic, and never
get to see the comic within. Drone-based super hero comic? I don't
even know what that means, but it sounds hilarious. I hope we get to
see Dronar in the upcoming sequels. ... I'm trying to imagine it. Maybe
Dronar is like Rom: SpaceKnight. Just a weird robot hero, and his
assignment is always to assassinate a terrorist. And he does it, the
end. Then the point is made in narration that our soldiers were kept
out of harm's way by our having sent Dronar on the mission. And the
point is also made that Dronar isn't breaking any international treaties
or whatever, because he's not human. He's DRONAR!
Back
to the Holy Nib, part 1 -- In the end, I felt like this was all just
the set up for the interesting story to come. I'm sad we didn't get to
see more of whatever's coming next. But, with little to no
encouragement from fans and peers, I can't blame you for doing it in
chunks, and waiting to see how you like it. So I'll have to just settle
for this first chunk, for now.
I'm very
curious as to what this plot is all about. It seems like the Kartonian
agents know who Pete is, but I don't know why they would. And I don't
know whether El Pulpo is in league with them -- is that him in that
get-up, or not? I'm guessing El Pulpo is able to do so little work
because he has a whole stable of kids like Pete. And it seems that the
agents want to enable their country to create great comics ... but how
that's related to all this, I don't know.
I'm eagerly awaiting parts 2 & 3, so chop-chop!
G
What a comprehensive, kind, constructive critique. Pure unadulterated genius!
ReplyDeleteI think so! Maybe a little too kind in places but I guess you're sensitive to the vulnerable egos of your fellow geniuses... ^_^
ReplyDeleteBTW - assuming you see this comment - would you mind some time sending me an uncompressed version of that photo of me from the slam that you posted? I liked how it came out, might be handy to have.
Will do.
ReplyDelete